ences and approaches because there are classical
forms being marketed on the fringe that they can
describe as 'the style of the eighties'.
Audiences overall are not prepared to be provoked,
nor do they expect to see demanding performances
when coming to view dance. It's really about educating
audiences, which has nothing to do with social class,
but is more about exposure to a variety of dance
approaches and for performers to have more access to
audiences.
You are a member of Chisenhale Dance Project -
what's that about for you? Surely one of the good
things about Chisenhale is that there are lots of women
around?
Chisenhale is developing many things that are really
vital both in supporting New Dance/media work and in
providing new stimulation to the local East End
community. It is fostering a new relationship between
experimental work and popular art forms.
Being an artist-run collective is really important; so
much of our work as artists is done in isolation and we
wind up running on parallel lines, competing and
holding back from supporting one another. What
Chisenhale is doing is joining forces and creating a
more unified, thoughtful approach, because as indivi-
duals we could never produce what we can as a group,
and we have more access to resources.
Chisenhale is a great base that gives me something
to belong to that is on the pulse of a lot of things that
are important socially and creatively. It provides a
range of people for support in terms of ideas and
relationships. It's a critical force and a constructive one.
I imagine that teaching, both private and to groups is a
very necessary part of your income, and that perform-
ances with a larger group of people would be quite
expensive to put on?
Well, exactly. I'm not really by disposition a solo
performer. I don't have that need for total control
Usually if I'm teaching I can also show performances.
People can see a method of working and then see the
lift and change into performance. Working with other
people on the finer details of anatomy and movement
and facilitating a more idiosyncratic, personal move-
ment style has been instructive. The teaching has been
where I've learned the most and the demand to
communicate clearly has helped me to articulate and
define my creative approach.
have also thoroughly enjoyed the collaborations!
have participated in particularly with other musi-
cians and performers doing improvisation. Without
this work I would be in a terrible vacuum which would
stifle some real needs to exchange with other people.
I have worked most consistently
with Chris Cheek, a
poet/performer, making an ongoing series called Dick
and Jane Books. There has been a real effort to
challenge our energy levels in performance and
develop a performance style that pokes fun at precon-
ceived stereotypes of sex and gender and makes
satirical references to media images and clichéd
language.
What are the conditions you see women working in?
in
There's plenty of women making and creating good
live performance, but access to major, large-scale
productions with ancillory help is still rare for women.
We're not getting enough chances to get our feet wet,
so often we are stilted in the power game, although not
our creativity. Power and creativity are linked on the
market place, not in any other critical way. In order for
women to function in a public way in their creativity
they need some capacity to deal with power structures.
It was really upsetting in 1984 to see the major
reshuffle of the National Theatre not include one
woman director. It's hard for us now, but at the same
time it's more ... I'd rather not have tokenism.
It makes the situation very clear.
Yeah, right ... (laughs).
Patricia Bardi's Theatre Papers (No 5) have been published by the
Department of Theatre, Dartington 1979. Excerpts were reprinted in
Contact Quarterly winter 1981, Vol.VI, No.2.
Hide TranscriptShow Transcript