anarchism, it was subversion in sheep's
clothing," says Gil, explaining why he and
Veloso were arrested in 1968. "It was a
social infection of troubling consequences
for young people. Those were the reasons
they gave." The musicians remained in
prison for two months. On their release the
military invited them, firmly, to leave the
country, and they spent the next three years
exiled in London. No charges were filed, but
according to Gil, their captors made it clear
enough why they'd been singled out: "You
represent a threat, something new, some-
thing that can't quite be understood, some-
thing that doesn't fit into any of the clear
compartments of existing cultural practices,
and that won't do. That is dangerous."
The decades since have been kinder to
tropicalismo. That Gil now helps govern the
same country he was banished from is just
one example of how the movement's ideas
have become integral to Brazil's self-image.
Those ideas are a feature of the country's
intellectual landscape, name-checked regu-
larly not just in doctoral dissertations but
on television talk shows and Carnaval floats.
But what's most striking about those
ideas - in fact downright uncanny - is how
the globalizing drift of technology and eco-
nomics is forcing a similar path on the rest
of us. In the production of all manner of
cultural goods - from music to software to
scientific knowledge itself - the logics of
networks, digital media, and global inter-
dependence are telling us to loosen up.
They're urging us to stretch our notions
of authorship and creativity, to let hybridity
and flux seep into the tools with which we
craft our cultures and ourselves.
It's no easy stretch - and the ever more
rigid attitudes of the intellectual property
industries don't make it any easier. But Brazil
has had these moves down for a while and
can surely teach us a few if we keep our
eyes open. At the very least it can teach us
the names for them. Gil and his team, for
instance, have coined a word to sum up
Brazil's approach to intellectual property
in the networked age. The idea, Gil says, is
to tropicalize.
"To make the digital world join in the
samba," Gil says, laughing again and set-
tling back into his chair, as if no further
explanation of the term was necessary. As
indeed none is. Any educated
Brazilian, after
all, could parse the phrase at a glance:
To tropicalize. Verb form of the noun.
Tropicalismo in motion.
As they did four decades ago, the tropicaliz-
ers have their adversaries. Most prominent
among them, not surprisingly, is Microsoft
Brazil. Generously funded lobbying efforts
have bought the company - and proprietary
software altogether - a degree of sympathy
within the governing party itself that is
the despair of open source hard-liners. So,
for that matter, has the sheer quantity of
Microsoft's business dealings in Brazil,
which have done more to nurture the coun-
try's IT industry than the free software crowd
likes to admit. Nor does it hurt closed source
software's public image when Microsoft offers
free copies of Windows, as it frequently
does, to local governments and to digital-
literacy programs for the poor.
But when largesse fails to do the job,
Microsoft has proved more than willing
to turn to the courts. In June, the company
filed criminal defamation charges against
government IT czar Amadeu. The cause
of action? A published interview in which
Amadeu said that Microsoft's giveaways
were a "drug-dealer practice" - a "Trojan
horse, a form of securing critical mass
to continue constraining the country."
Calling the remarks "absurd and criminal,"
Microsoft's official complaint placed particu-
lar emphasis, without any apparent irony,
on Amadeu's assertion that the company's
business strategies rely on the sowing of
"fear, uncertainty, and doubt." On the advice
of lawyers, Amadeu didn't even bother
responding to the charges, and in the wake
of international online protests mobilized by
Brazil's open source community, Microsoft
withdrew them. But notice had been served:
The world's largest software company isn't
about to sit by while Brazil flirts with mortal
threats to its business model.
Nor, actually, is the world's largest enter-
tainment conglomerate, Time Warner, as
Gil discovered soon after announcing his
decision to rerelease his music under the
Creative Commons free-sampling license.
Legally speaking, the decision wasn't
entirely his to make. Gil retains some rights
to his songs, but the rights to the actual
The Rapture/ Sister Saviour
(Blackstrobe Remix)
The Rapture is itself something of a remix.
Equal parts punk, funk, and dance, the band's
music is inspired by hip hop's mash-up men-
tality. "All the groups we grew up listening
to used samples," says singer Luke Jenner
"People should be able to take whatever they
want and use it however they choose." Does
that go for file-sharing too? "I don't care if
people download our songs. If they like them,
they'
buy the record." - A.D.
:13
Cornelius/ Wataridori 2
Like the Planet of the Apes character he
named himself after, Keigo Oyamada is an
archaeologist. His dig site is the used-record
bin, his lab is the studio, and his field reports
are sonic pastiches. Although he starts with
digital samples, Oyamada seasons his tracks
with acoustic guitars and environmental
recordings. Check out the gentle atmospher-
ics of "Wataridori 2" for a taste of Oyamada's
organic take on electronic music. - E.S.
WIRED. 112004.195